Monday, February 24, 2014

Book Review: Shirley by Charlotte Brontë


“Shirley” takes place in rural Yorkshire during the regency period. Caroline is the pretty and quiet niece of the parish rector, stern Mr. Helstone. She spends much of her time with her distant cousins, Robert and Hortense Moore. Caroline is in love with Robert, but he is more worried about how bad the business affairs revolving around his mill are going. Enter Shirley: the young and charming mistress of Fieldhead, a local manor house. Shirley and Caroline become fast friends, their dissimilar natures complementing each other beautifully. But things are far from idyllic. Robert's cotton mill (which Shirley has shares in) is about to fail and Robert seems to be attracted to Shirley. The working class is getting more and more discontented, growing violent from lack of work (or simply a wish to stir up trouble) and some of the leaders will stop at nothing to get revenge.

 To begin with, I really entered into the feelings of the characters. At one point for instance, Shirley and Caroline are spending a summer night together at the rectory and they are waiting for something to happen. I found myself getting all tight and tense as if I was sitting right beside them. The descriptions of the countryside and weather are beautiful.

As for the characters, they are very well crafted. Caroline is so sweet and just the sort of girl one would wish for a friend. She finds herself in a situation where she could easily become bitter toward two people, but instead she buries her feeling as far as she is able, and not allowing them to interfere with her friendships, she unselfishly devotes herself to working for others. Shirley is a harder person to define. At times I loved her and at others she made me furious! But then that is the way she affects people in the story. She even drives her best friends crazy at times with her odd freaks of temper (one of the only people she does not confuse is a certain man, but I won't tell you his name!). One thing I do admire about her is that she is not a flirt. At one point, when she finds out that she had unknowingly led someone astray concerning her feelings, she is shocked and takes all the responsibility (terribly embarrassed that she might lead someone to think she was trying to catch a husband).  Mr. Moore reminded me of Mr. Thornton–actually it should be the other way round, since Shirley was written five years before N&S (Gaskell must have read “Shirley”)–anyway, they seemed similar in many points, not the least of which being that they are both stern men on the outside, but can be very gentle and tender with their womenfolk and both have difficulty connecting to their workers.

“Shirley” is high on my list of favorite classics.  Miss Brontë's writing style and choice of words are refreshing to read. This is a classic that definitely deserves to be more well known!

Stars: 5/5

Sunday, January 19, 2014

Movie Spotlight: Persuasion (2007)

This is my first post for the Jane Austen Review Challenge hosted by Miss Bennet at Classic Ramblings.

For the most part my favorite Jane Austen film tends be the one I last viewed (except, of course, in the case of it being an Unforgivably Repulsive Version). However, this Persuasion is certainly in my top three favorites. Possibly even the very first, excepting the S&S '95/'08 (I always count those as one film :) ). So now that we have that important disclaimer written concerning my view on this film, we will proceed forth to the logistics.



Though this Persuasion does take a few liberties with the story I think it stays very faithful to the tone of Miss Austen's work. And as for the little bits that the filmmakers add, I think they transcribe some of those feelings that are only told of in the novel–as well as being the type of “story moments” that make you grip the sides of your chair with excitement at either the sweetness or the tension of the scene. And that brings me to another reason why I love this film–it is simply so poignant. While all the costumes and scenery are very well done, they never detract from the story and it is the characters faces and personalities for which you remember the movie, though, to be sure, it is of great assistance that the characters are excellent.



The Characters: IMHO Sally Hawkins is the perfect Anne. She is not a stunning beauty, but I think the filmmakers made her less “pretty” on purpose. One begins to notice her expressions and eyes so much more than one might. Anne's looks are not meant to be her strong point, instead it is her character, her gentle ways, and the actions she performs that set her apart. And besides, my sister Heidi and I think that her beauty really does become more apparent on each viewing.



Rupert Penry-Jones is flawless as Captain Wentworth, in that his flaws are the flaws of Captain Wentworth and not that of his own performance. He shows how Captain Wentworth is hurt and angry, but how he can still not help but care for Anne. I love how he tends to gravitate toward Anne–not as if he is the Ghost of Resentful Suitor Past–but simply because, though quite unconscious of it himself, he feels pleasure in being near her.  Witness the scene where he picks her up after she falls off the log...*happy sigh*...I love that scene. He is also of the right age and appearance for Captain Wentworth.



All of the sub-characters are well done, however my favorite is Captain Harville. In the book he is–for the most part–a very minor character, but in this film you see more glimpses of his and Captain Wentworth's friendship–which is really neat–and as he is “there” for multiple characters, you get to see what an amazing man he is.  :)



Altogether this is a simply beautiful movie and I very highly recommend it!

Stars: 5 + / 5

Monday, January 13, 2014

Book Review: Shattered Summer by Madeleine Polland


In the summer of 1685, Monmouth landed on the Dorset, declaring himself the legitimate son of Charles II and claiming the throne. Duke's man or King's man? Loyalties are divided as Monmouth rides through the West Country at the head of his random – farmers armed with only scythes and pitchforks. And the young girl Frances, who is thrown from her sheltered life into the heart of the uprising, finds herself doubting the one man she had trusted, and uncertain even of where her love belongs.
THE book. You know the book I am speaking of. The one that when you are finished reading, you feel as if you could start reading it over at once. And you do. And then you do it again; and again. Everyone has that book, I think. “Shattered Summer” is mine. I read it for the first time last spring and I cannot say how many times I read it before it had to go back to the library. But now I have it for my very own and I am one happy girl. :) 
So what is it about this story that keeps it from being just another romance? First, there is serious and understanding William Powell who keeps both Frances (and the story) sane. Second, there is Lady Sarah, Frances' mother, who is fluttery and flustered when little things go wrong and discerning and capable when great matters are at stake. Finally there is gentle, quick, and confused Frances herself. Frances who makes, with William, one of my very favorite literary couples.
And why else do I love this story? Did I mention that there are lovely descriptions of houses and the English countryside–and drama? But not really drama of the directly romantic kind, but of the soldier-and-battle-wound variety, and that is one of my favorite kinds. It is a simple story, but it breathes of the warm, rich, haze of summer and other lovely things like that. It one of those tales that keeps coming to mind, refusing to be put away in the attic and forgotten.

Stars: 5 + of 5 

Monday, January 6, 2014

Christmas Spotlights

Today I would like to share mini- reviews of three Christmas films that I greatly enjoy:


“Little Women” (1933) -  I have seen three adaptions of Little Women (including the 1994 film) and this is definitely my favorite. Katharine Hepburn is the Jo of the book come alive. And all of the rest of the cast play their parts excellently as well. The sets are very good and all the dresses are fun and pretty. Though it is a fairly short film it has all the gaiety, cozy spirit and freshness of the novel. It is one of my all time favorite movies and I highly recommend it!


“Love Comes Softly” -  Yet another top favorite, “Love Comes Softly” is one of those stories that at the end of which you feel blissful and contented. I am not going to describe the story here, I will simply say that it is very sweet.  The scenery is stunning with many views of breathtaking western vistas. And though small, the cast is excellent. Clark and Marty also happen to be one of my favorite film couples. So, watch this film for the characters, the story, or the scenery, any way it is wonderful!


“The Gift of Love” -  This film takes place in early 1900's New York City. The story revolves around a beautiful young heiress, Beth, and Rudi, a Swiss immigrant. The bird watching naturalist Beth is supposed to marry is hilarious and there are several very fun ice skating scenes. It is a fairly straightforward story and if you are in the mood for some simple romance with pleasant characters it makes for an enjoyable viewing experience. As my father said it is altogether: “A fun little movie.” 

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Movie Spotlight: Daddy - Long - Legs (1919)


Judy Abbott has spent all her life in an orphan asylum, taking care of the other orphans and getting herself in trouble (mainly in the interests of the other children). That is, until a trustee decides to send her to college. He wishes to be known only as Mr. Smith and the only other thing she knows about him is that he has long legs. Hence, she addresses all her letters to him as Daddy-Long-Legs. Away at college she makes new friends–most importantly, handsome and wealthy Jarvis Pendleton–and suffers from the snobbery inflicted upon her by the high society people with whom she comes into contact. Feeling herself forced to refuse the offer of marriage of the man she loves, Judy is desperate for good advice. In the seeking of said good advice she receives the greatest shock of her life.


It is done. I have seen my first silent movie. I had read the book several years ago and thought it a romantic and hilarious story, but was disappointed with her manner of talking about religious matters. However, I still liked the story and having seen a bit of this picture–and having four half-hour drives (please note, I was not driving :)) to and from a dance and conference and not wishing to spend it in idleness–I sought it out on You-Tube and watched the 1:24 minute film. At first I had my doubts. No music or talking or anything…how tiresome is that? But I loved it! I really did! And wish to watch it again. The movie makers had taken out the provoking ideology and had left (or added) the funny parts. Mary Pickford who plays Judy is known as the greatest silent film actress and I think she deserves the title. She is pretty, feminine, clever, and fun, without being flirty or flighty, and she manages to make that all clear without you hearing her voice and yet without overdoing her acting. In addition, she has some beautiful “Titanic”-era dresses. Jarvis's acting was well done too. I thought he looked a little strange at times, though as my sister said, if there was music at those points they would be very sad, so it is simply my immature mind which dislikes it. However, for the most part I liked him very much.

As for the scenery, I thought it was actually better than many newer films I have seen (the ‘95 Persuasion comes to mind). From what I could tell the outdoor scenes were really shot outdoors and the interior ones were good too.

Yes or no on silent films? Judging off this one a definite yes! I was surprised at how alive the story became without any sound and only text on the screen every once in a while to show the most important lines. So, I recommend the (1919) Daddy-Long-Legs to those who enjoy old films, sweet romance, and humor.

Stars: 4.5/5

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Book Review: The Horn of Roland by Jay Williams


Roland is the nephew of the mighty Charlemagne. When but a boy he–with his eleven fellow squires–turns the tide of a great battle and is knighted. Afterward all twelve become known as The Peers of France. Roland leads his companions to many victories against the Saracens and wins fame and glory among the Christian nations, but treachery and enemies from within are harder to guard against and Roland has gained the hatred of Count Ganelon. And Ganelon has no qualms about doing away with Roland, even if it comes to consorting with the very enemies of Christendom...
                                                             
Even before I had read much about Roland I had thought of him as one of the most wonderful and heroic men in history (possibly because of a splendid painting we have in a book). Either way, to me the story of Roland is in the same class as Robin Hood and William Wallace. (I know, I know–Robin Hood is technically not a historical figure, whereas W. Wallace and Roland are, but he practically is.) But what I mean by saying he is in the same class is that a.) they are  great and honorable heroes and b.) their stories all end tragically. Oops, I hope I did not spoil the story, but everyone knows that those heroes die… don't they? Legendary heroes always have to die, because it is a sad but proven fact that to have a story really “stick” the hero must die. The story is written in a surprisingly simple style, but I assure you the author tells you enough–or at least he tells you all the right things. I hardly ever cry in books, but at the end of “The Horn Of Roland” tears were literally dripping off my face. The only other book that I remember crying that much about was “The Scottish Chiefs” which is–surprise–about William Wallace. (If I can help it, I do not read the ends of books about Robin Hood.)

Should one read “The Horn of Roland”? Yes. Possibly the story could have been written in a more overtly gripping style yet on further thought it really was. Many times it is the simple things that have the most power and this book is certainly in that class. And I certainly enjoyed it.

Stars: 4 out of 5
Content: Fighting, but not any especially gory descriptions

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Movie Spotlight: Pride and Prejudice (BBC/A&E 1995)


As of a month or so ago, if you had asked me if I had ever seen the 1995 P&P the conversation would have gone something like this:

“No, certainly not, and I never wish to.”

“Why not?”

“Just look at the screen shots of Mr. Darcy. Oh, and that terrible and foolish scene where he has been swimming? Ha, Ha! That is so silly. You see, I am just too smart to watch that silly of a period drama.” At this point I would laugh and walk away with my nose in the air thinking, “Goodness, I don't know why everyone is so batty over that silly movie.”

But the important thing to note is that I wrote that clever little conversation in the past tense for you. See, I am one of the truly enlightened people now. I have watched it and, indeed, my feelings have undergone so material a change since the time alluded to as to make me view the film with pleasure; and I am terribly afraid I am absolutely head over heels in love with every single bit of it (well, possibly not Lydia and Mrs Bennett and one or two lesser things, but that is of absolutely no importance whatsoever). But I will now attempt to compose myself into a more genteel mode of conduct and write this review in a more ordered manner.


Elizabeth Bennett – Jennifer Ehle as Lizzy brings out the sweet and gentle side of her character. She is caring, observant, ladylike, and possesses a wonderful sense of humor. This version of the P&P story takes out many of her sharper lines from the book and so she comes clearly across as a kind young lady. I also like that, though she is smart, she does not always have a clever answer on the tip of her tongue. She is beautiful and has a wholesome and subdued sparkle radiating from her eyes, her face, and even her curls. The way she deals with her family is very neat. She is perfectly aware of their faults yet is never short or ill-tempered with them. And to add to all this...she loves to read and even manages to run around the countryside without being in the least bit hoydenish. Altogether I found it impossible not to admire and love this Lizzy.


Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy – We have all heard Mr. Darcy referred to as the ultimate romantic hero, yet until recently I have never been able to understand why. Once I had seen Colin Firth's Mr. Darcy, though, I knew. I generally do not like the out and out romantic heroes that spend their days riding around their large estates and their evenings in sitting rooms drinking wine with their sophisticated friends, generally preferring the “working” gentleman...a doctor, persay. Ahem, pardon me, doctors are rather a habit for me, but I digress... So to return, I had never been very attracted to Mr. Darcy, but that was only until I became acquainted with the real Mr. Darcy. And I do not think I exaggerate. Yet even as I was thinking that, I could enter into Elizabeth's feelings of dislike for him as I have been able to in no other form of the story, including *whisper* the book. Quite a shocking lack of imagination to be sure, but so it 'tis. In this adaptation the “other side” of Mr. Darcy's character is often shown, especially his connection and loving older brother care for Georgiana (which, by the bye, was perfect for the part). Seeing Mr. Darcy fencing was also a treat. And now I will address the “infamous” swimming scene. 1.) I don't think it was shocking at all. The impression I had always received from the rumors I had heard was that he had been swimming his morning laps and appeared before Elizabeth with (as my sister commented) an exercise towel around his shoulders! But that was not at all the case. He had been journeying home from London and being hot and bothered in mind, decided to jump (for all practical purposes, fully clothed) into the pond. What do you think you would do in his place? To be frank, that little episode at Pemberly was one of my favorites in the film. To finish with, I can summarize this Mr. Darcy as one who is very deeply caring and also the one who has finally made me see Mr. Darcy for what he is: a gentleman who, when he is rebuked for his faults takes the rebuke to heart and so shows himself to be a true man, and is the best landlord and best master. And yes, since he is far more than a pure hero of romance, he is the “ultimate” romantic hero.



Mr. Bingley and Jane – Mr. Bingley was fun and always smiling. He was at all times the perfect gentleman and host–though, poor fellow, between his sisters and Mr. Darcy, he did at times have a hard time being so. It took some time for me to become connected to Jane. However, I did come to like her very much. Particularly in the second part when she talked more so I came to understand her better.



The Others – Mr. Bennet was a little nicer than in the book, but I actually liked him much better that way–I could see why Lizzy liked him so much! Mrs. Bennet and Lydia were very irritating, but since that is the way they are in the book that is quite fine. I think Mr. Collins was more slimy and not so funny as he ought to of been, but again, that is all right. It was nice to see Maria Lucas so you knew that not all girls of fifteen were as giddy as Lydia, and Georgiana was very sweet.



Scenery/Sets – Excellent! You very much felt as if you were in an English village. The countryside was good and the houses were elegant and airy. Much to the consternation of my elder sister, I keep on calling Pemberly “Mr. Darcy’s Hospital” since it looks to my mind like an old hospital from the days of Cherry Ames because of its great brick front, but I mean it as a compliment to the building.



Costumes – Somewhat simple, as most of Lizzy's dresses were either white or shades akin to it, but all very pretty and fresh, especially compared to the Bingley sisters. I cannot remember the specifics of the other ladies' costumes. I do know, however, they went well with the story. My favorite of the outfits was a coral gown that Lizzy wore at Lady Catherine's and a yellow, girlish looking dress that Maria Lucas wears at the same time. Those are my favorites, but there were many others that I very much liked. The men's costumes were also well done. Why don't men wear those shirts with “the shoulders off the shoulders” and the wide sleeves any more? And what about cravats? Ties are nothing in comparison. :)


Parts I did not enjoy so much – I do not wish to give the least bit of a bad taint to the movie, but I also appreciate when people tell all the nitty, gritty, disgusting details of a movie: so here you have them. There is one scene with Mr. Darcy in his bath, but you can only see his shoulders (far less than you see of people on the beach), and one scene with Wickham at Cambridge. There are also one or two scenes with Wickham and Lydia, but they show nothing. They are just in a room together and Wickham is writing and Lydia–fully clothed–is dancing around the place. All of the above scenes are very easy to skip. It may sound like a lot of “scenes”, but there did not seem that many when you were watching and, though I would have liked it if they had been left out, the sister committee do not feel that they tainted the movie in any way. I assure you, they sound far worse in print than they are in the movie. We just looked away and ta-DA, it was great!



Favorite Scenes – This is not at all fair, because I loved nearly every scene and since I have only seen it all the way through once I don't remember every little part. However, if forced to say, the entire Pemberly episode–from when Elizabeth first views the house to her meeting Miss Darcy to the scene where she reads Jane's letter and tells Mr. Darcy of Lydia's elopement–is a section that very much stands out to me. Also all the little scenes betwixt Elizabeth and Jane were beautiful as you saw their wonderful sibling understanding for each other though their temperaments are different.


Final Thoughts – This film has often been called the definitive Jane Austen adaptation and I passionately concur. Indeed, it vies very closely with the '95 S&S as my favorite Austen adaptation and that means I love, love, loved it! If you have not seen this film you are seriously missing out and I eagerly encourage you to do so! Run to the nearest library, collect your sisters, and settle down for five entire hours of pure drama, costume, humor, and romantic bliss. What are you waiting for?
Stars: 5+/5



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...